Dear LJ...
Jul. 30th, 2010 11:57 pm![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
Today, I got to explain to my mom "who gets to be the man" in lesbian relationships.
I hope I did right by my lesbian friends.
I also got to explain about "bears". "So you know those tough motorcycle guys you see at Sturgis? Yeah, gay."
I love my mother dearly, but her life in a monoculture has made her very strange to me.
later
Tom
I hope I did right by my lesbian friends.
I also got to explain about "bears". "So you know those tough motorcycle guys you see at Sturgis? Yeah, gay."
I love my mother dearly, but her life in a monoculture has made her very strange to me.
later
Tom
no subject
Date: 2010-07-31 03:58 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-07-31 04:32 am (UTC)Neither, if they wanted a man, they wouldn't be lesbians.
I know that's a really simplified version, but the subtleties confuse me a lot of the time and would just go right over my mom's head. I assume every relationship is a snowflake and the participants in the relationship decide who takes on what gender roles (or if they share/exchange it, or if a given gender role is even important to their relationship).
It would be nice for my mom if all lesbian relationships fell along a strict femme/dyke pairing that synced up to a female/male het relationship and that all gender roles were perfectly codified. I suppose I've seen so many combinations that I find it difficult to say anything definitive since I know no one label applies. I've given up easy certainty in favor of infinate possibilites, but that makes it hard to try and help people from the monoculture look outside the box.
Still, I hope I conveyed the general idea to my mom. At least I didn't say "the one currently wearing the strap-on". :)
later
Tom
no subject
Date: 2010-07-31 03:59 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-07-31 07:04 pm (UTC)That's a good way of explaining the basics! (You'd think it would be obvious, but it's amazing how many "obvious" things need to be explained....)
no subject
Date: 2010-07-31 04:07 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-07-31 04:36 am (UTC)Laat night we had supper with some old friends of the family. The daughter is a lesbian and has a partner. Both women fall onto the dyke end of the spectrum so both were relatively "masculine" in my mom's eyes. "Who gets to be the man" is a burning question when you live in heteronormative-land and I was the person most likely to know so...
later
Tom
no subject
Date: 2010-07-31 12:28 pm (UTC)That actually makes a lot of sense. I just tripped over my own generalizations there - I forgot that Omaha might have lesbians.
no subject
Date: 2010-07-31 04:09 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-07-31 07:02 pm (UTC)Dare I ask
Date: 2010-07-31 01:02 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-07-31 01:23 pm (UTC)This particular couple did have a definite femme/dyke bias. Based on that, they did wear a dress and a tux, respectively. However, all of their friends were assigned assigned as groomsmen or bridesmaids based on which of the couple they knew better. And while the male bridesmaid's didn't wear dresses, all of the groomsmen wore tuxes.
So, my sister happened to be the best man and wear a tux to the wedding. My niece (who was 7 at the time) was a ring bearer and also wore a little tux.
no subject
Date: 2010-07-31 01:30 pm (UTC)Some Christmas or other I should explain the hanky code to her. :-)
Also, ALL women over 6 feet tall are "drag queens" as far as she's concerned, no exceptions. I spent my brother's wedding trying to assure her that our cousin's drop-dead gorgeous 6'2" fiance was in fact female (and has since had a baby).
no subject
Date: 2010-07-31 01:46 pm (UTC)LOL. That's actually really funny. A little sad, but funny.
no subject
Date: 2010-07-31 04:31 pm (UTC)2. Those tough motorcycle guys are not ALL gay..
no subject
Date: 2010-07-31 08:07 pm (UTC)1.) The guy is the man, duh. ;)
2.) I know, but anything to make her consider that gay people might be around is a good deal.
no subject
Date: 2010-07-31 09:27 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-08-02 04:11 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-08-02 04:16 am (UTC)