bluegargantua: (Default)
[personal profile] bluegargantua
Hi,

Remember that informal study about sexism on the cover of Dragon Magazine? Yeah, you'll fondly wish for more of that after seeing this. [MILDLY NSFW]

"Girls just ain't into D&D..."
Tom

Date: 2007-10-31 05:59 pm (UTC)
bluepapercup: (Default)
From: [personal profile] bluepapercup
It's like if Second Life made RPG supplements!

Date: 2007-10-31 06:14 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] mikecap.livejournal.com
Not very impressed with the lack of objectivity on the part of the surveyor. The definitions of "submissive" and "suggestive" left a lot to be desired. It would have been easier to actually use percentages of skin showing and relative tightness of clothing as objective measures.

Date: 2007-10-31 06:19 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] z-gryphon.livejournal.com
"I shall not today attempt further to define the kinds of material I understand to be embraced within that shorthand description; and perhaps I could never succeed in intelligibly doing so. But I know it when I see it, and the motion picture involved in this case is not that."

- Justice Potter Stewart, Supreme Court of the United States; concurring opinion, Jacobellis v. Ohio, 1964

Date: 2007-10-31 06:43 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] mikecap.livejournal.com
The surveyor could also have shown the group of images to a significant sample set of an audience and had them rate the suggestiveness and submissiveness of the images and taken that statistic... there were probably a dozen ways it could have been done better than just "me decided". I take umbrage with the supreme court decision, as well as with bodies like the MPAA who think they "know it when they see it". Cultures decide norms, not individuals, or even small groups of individuals.

Date: 2007-10-31 06:45 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] z-gryphon.livejournal.com
"Culture" is just the tyranny of the mediocre majority, which is pretty much what bodies like the Supreme Court are designed to distill into a manageable sample size. :)

Date: 2007-10-31 06:48 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] mikecap.livejournal.com
Do you see boobs/muscles/bulges? Yes, okay, that's tight. Are they really busting out, and are there cleavage openings showing them bust out? Okay, that's extra tight. Of course there's still a subjective component, but it's a lot easier to judge tightness of clothing as one of several factors than simply saying "suggestiveness". A robe is obviously less tight than a chainmail bikini or fitted booby armor...

Date: 2007-10-31 08:15 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] jeregenest.livejournal.com
Oh voy. Yet another reason to ignore most of the gaming world. Like I needed another one.

Date: 2007-11-01 01:04 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] mrf-arch.livejournal.com
Not since the Ral Partha / Dennis Mize "Slave Auction" miniatures has gaming reached such an apex.

Date: 2007-11-01 01:31 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] mpgalvin.livejournal.com
lol original or special edition?

Date: 2007-11-02 12:51 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] mpgalvin.livejournal.com
is disposable sexism more demeaning somehow?

*i'm* not designing that experiment.

Profile

bluegargantua: (Default)
bluegargantua

October 2020

S M T W T F S
    123
45678910
11121314151617
18192021222324
25 262728293031

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated May. 24th, 2025 03:48 pm
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios