bluegargantua (![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
bluegargantua) wrote2007-04-16 09:36 pm
bluegargantua) wrote2007-04-16 09:36 pm
Entry tags:
Seeing Reviews
Hi,
The other day I finished off Seeing Red: A Study in Consciousness by Nicholas Humphrey. It's a slim volume in which the author (a psychologist and philosopher) attempts to explain what consciousness is and how it may have evolved in humans and what it's good for.
Y'know, nothing major.
His basic thrust is that when you see a red screen, two things happen:
1.) You perceive the existence of the red screen.
2.) You experience the red screen (you are "redding" as he puts it).
These two things happen instantaneously and independently of each other. And it's in the experiencing of the red that consciousness arises.
Like any good scientist, he's happy to point out where his model has been attacked (and his counter-arguments). He doesn't fully present a range of competing viewpoints, but I think he can be forgiven that. Certainly he builds a compelling case.
This has been a nice non-fiction supplement to Blindsight and Permanence and despite being a quick read, there's a lot to think about. I don't know if this resolves or exacerbates my existential crisis, but it was a good read nonetheless.
later
Tom
The other day I finished off Seeing Red: A Study in Consciousness by Nicholas Humphrey. It's a slim volume in which the author (a psychologist and philosopher) attempts to explain what consciousness is and how it may have evolved in humans and what it's good for.
Y'know, nothing major.
His basic thrust is that when you see a red screen, two things happen:
1.) You perceive the existence of the red screen.
2.) You experience the red screen (you are "redding" as he puts it).
These two things happen instantaneously and independently of each other. And it's in the experiencing of the red that consciousness arises.
Like any good scientist, he's happy to point out where his model has been attacked (and his counter-arguments). He doesn't fully present a range of competing viewpoints, but I think he can be forgiven that. Certainly he builds a compelling case.
This has been a nice non-fiction supplement to Blindsight and Permanence and despite being a quick read, there's a lot to think about. I don't know if this resolves or exacerbates my existential crisis, but it was a good read nonetheless.
later
Tom
no subject
no subject
The chip me will either be an incredibly asshole or so patently patronizing I'll have to pull the plug on it.
Tom
no subject
"I think you mean *we're* a dick."
"Hm, yes. I guess that's the end of us then."
"And see, normally we'd be in complete agreement with us, except that my we is me, and your we is you. But we suppose we'd do the same thing if we were us."
"Asshole." *YANK*